One year down: How do the PlayStations stack up?

At first, we weren't quite sure what our ethereal host wanted us to do with this incredibly important message. After hours upon hours of internal discussion, we made no headway into uncovering what we believe is certainly the key to finding the meaning of life.
With nothing else to do, we began talking about our undying love for the PlayStation 3, but the PS2 and PS1 kept creeping into the conversation until we started to compare the three systems. And now that the PlayStation 3 has just turned a year old, what better time to look back at how it stacks up against the PlayStation 2 and PlayStation than the present?
So sit down, grab a hot cup of cocoa and be prepared to be wowed, because some of our findings may surprise you.

Of course, the most common way gamers look at a console's success is how many units it's shipped or sold. While most people know the PlayStation and PlayStation 2 are the largest-selling home consoles ever with more than 100 million units sold each, did you know that, in its first year, the PS3 nearly doubled the sales of the original PlayStation?

Although many gamers were pretty skeptical regarding the "success" of the PlayStation 3's launch, Sony continued to toot its horn saying it was more successful than its predecessors. "[The] PlayStation 3 launch has been, objectively by any measure, more successful than PlayStation 1, PlayStation 2 or other competing system out previously," boasted Phil Harrison in a February interview.
To back up that claim, Sony reported the PS3 was the fastest PlayStation console to reach 1 million sales, only taking the new machine six weeks to hit the landmark. Although reliable sales figures for the PS2 and PS1 are hard to come by today, the PlayStation 2 was breaking records in its own right when it launched. In the first 24 hours, the PlayStation 2 sold 500,000 units and generated more than $250 million in total revenue. Moreover, it was, at the time, the most successful launch ever and shattered that of the Sega Dreamcast's $97 million and with it, the hopes and dreams of millions of Sega fanboys.
Bringing up the rear is the original PlayStation having shipped 800,000 units from its launch in September to the end of the year.
Although sales figures are important to the companies involved, gamers care more about the games, right? Well, in this three-way fight, the PlayStation 2 is the clear winner in terms of sheer numbers when it launched with 29 titles, headlined by Tekken Tag Tournament. Due to several unanticipated delays to high-profile games such as Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, the PlayStation 3 only had a dozen titles available at launch. While the North American PS3 launch was a bit light on the software side with only 12 titles, Europe received double that amount when it shipped there in March. Funny enough, the original PlayStation, which many regard as having one of the best libraries of all time, only had 12 titles when it launched, too.

Undoubtedly, the PS3's biggest criticism has been its hefty price tag, which, depending on how you look at it, has forced Sony to cut the price and offer new, cheaper hardware models. While the PS1 and PS2 were both launched at the $300 price mark, Sony chose to overstuff the PS3 with features like Blu-ray, HDMI port, WiFi and more, which caused the 60GB and 20GB model to a skyscraping $600 and 500 price tag, respectively.
Having launched in North America on Sept. 9, 1995, the PlayStation 1 didn't see its first price cut until more than a year later when Sony cut it from $300 to $200. Taking a page from its older brother's playbook, the PS2 didn't get a price reduction until May 2002, which was roughly 19 months after its initial release.
Whether you look at it as Sony realizing its newest console was in trouble or if it was just being nice, the PS3 got its first mark down only eight months later when Sony slashed the price of the 60GB from $600 to $500 and launched the 80GB model with Motorstorm at the original $600 mark in August. However, that price didn't even last very long before Sony once again slashed the 80GB PS3's price by $100 and introduced the more wallet-friendly 40GB unit.
If judging by price cuts alone, it appears that Sony realized it couldn't stay in the game with such a higher-priced unit than its competitors and quickly reacted to meet industry norms. Although it's still higher priced than the Xbox 360 and Wii, there's no debating the technology-for-dollar deal consumers are getting. With two price cuts in its first year, we don't expect to see Sony slicing and dicing the PlayStation 3 for awhile.

Although the PS3 and PS1 shared the same amount of games on launch day, the story is far different when looking at it at the end of both system's first year on the market. The PlayStation threw down 116 titles, while the PlayStation 3 has only managed to release 65 titles so far in North America and even less in Europe. However, the PS2 is the winner here boasting more than 200 games all within its first year of existence.
Looking at the PS3 lagging so far behind in sheer number of games is a bit concerning, but with Kaz Hirai's recent announcement that Sony will release more than 380 games on the PS3 and PlayStation Network, it makes it a lot easier to stomach the drought. On the other hand, since that number includes 180 PlayStation Network games, many will undoubtedly be games originally released on past PlayStation consoles, so that takes away a bit of our enthusiasm.

With the technology still in its infancy, Sony eschewed online support for the PlayStation 1 and didn't give any online love for the PS2 until 2002, several years after its release.
Having finally understood the massive popularity of online play, Sony made sure the PlayStation 3 was online capable right out of the box. The PlayStation Network, while still free, now offers most of the same features that Xbox Live users are enjoying. Boasting more than 5.5. million users, the PlayStation Network has definitely been a step in the right direction, and with Home, the PlayStation Store, downloadable movies and music, and further online integration of the PSP and PS3, the PSN will most assuredly close the gap between it and Xbox Live.

Longtime PlayStation owners can attest to the frustrating nights spent flipping over-heated PlayStations on their backsides or being filled with rage when met with the dreaded "Disc Read Error" on the PS2. With so many hardware problems, Sony quickly became the brunt of many jokes throughout the industry and journalists and gamers alike fully expected the PlayStation 3 to follow in its predecessors' footsteps.
However, that hasn't happened. Somewhere down the line, Sony has seemed to rectify this issue as the mass majority of PlayStation 3 owners have had the surprising luxury of still owning their original system without experiencing any problems whatsoever.
Even though recent reports claimed the PS3 had hardware failure rate of 40 percent, those claims were quickly denied by Sony of Europe and eventually the site pulled the article altogether. We imagine if the numbers were anywhere near that high, we'd see internet riots the likes of which only Xbox 360 fanboys can relate.
Conclusion
As the dust settles, it's clear the PlayStation 3 isn't quite keeping up to the pace its elder siblings set in the generations before it. Even PlayStation fanboys must admit that the PlayStation 3 had a rocky start ... and that's putting it lightly. But despite its setbacks, it appears the PS3 has finally found its identity. With a competitive price tag, a massive surge in software and the biggest marketing push Sony has ever put behind its consoles, all indicators point to the PlayStation 3 having a stellar year and putting all those bad memories to rest for good.
See ya next year!





Get a WordPress.com Blog



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Sora57 @ Nov 19th 2007 11:07PM
Rocky start. We'll see soon enough how quickly it gets its footing now.
Moe @ Nov 19th 2007 11:12PM
What was sony thinking when they released a $600 console. Someone should have shown them that bar graph.
RazielDune @ Nov 19th 2007 11:15PM
They were thinking we want to have games on Blu-Ray and Blu-Rays Players were expensive and they didn't want to lose tons of money like Mircosoft since they don't have Bill gates Cheating lieing stealing windows running pockets backing them so they went with the option of haveing profits not tottally crashed into billions lost.
Kspraydad @ Nov 19th 2007 11:29PM
As the dust settles and PS3 in the same sentence!
Funny.
SR @ Nov 20th 2007 12:03AM
Firmware 2.1 is available for download. Check the system update.
organic_shadow @ Nov 20th 2007 4:54AM
Seeing the photo of the PSone reminded me of my PS1(not the remodel) back in the day. I just now realized that I abused the crap out of that thing and it never let me down. I kept it in a stuffy drawer with a hole stabbed into the back of it to pull the cords through. I would slam the door shut when I was mad. Wow. I'm a jerk.
I'll let you all know I have been treating my PS3 very nicely though. We won't talk about my PS2 though... as it's uhh.... with another man now.
miguelon918 @ Nov 20th 2007 1:12AM
I actually never had any error messages with my ps2 wich is 6 years old! and hell i have used it a lot...but anyways i think that the ps3 had a decent year but 2008 has to be the year of the ps3.
jango fett @ Nov 20th 2007 2:46AM
i really liked this article. keep it up guys!
Citizen Cook @ Nov 20th 2007 6:26AM
Never did care for the Playstation brand. Never seemed to have the games i wanted. I switched to Xbox as soon as the first console was released and never looked back.
Ah, good old Xbox.
Jmmaroli @ Nov 23rd 2007 11:48AM
I still have my 11 year old PS1 and my 6 year old PS2.
chevron @ Nov 20th 2007 8:56AM
@9, why are you even here? weird...
My first ps2 had problems with the blue sony discs, but I have never, ever had any problems with ps1, my 'year two' ps2, or my 20gb ps3.
Price is the oldest story going around. I wonder if sony could release a crippled box like the 360 arcade for $300? Not much more they could really strip out of it though...
Galley @ Nov 20th 2007 8:57AM
At least the systems are built like tanks. In nuclear war, you can be sure of only two survivors: cockroaches and PS3s.
Adam @ Nov 20th 2007 10:12AM
The Problem with Sony and the PS3 is that they're success (or lack of sucess) has not been because of how great the PS3 is but rather it is riding off the success and fan base of the PS2. What made the PS2 so successful? It was the games!!! The PS3 had had a HUGE problem in this area. Aside for Resistance: Fall of Man, what quality titles has sony had that the 360 has not done a compairable job? Lair was a huge disappointment. The only thing that the PS3 has going for it is the Blu-Ray Player. I am not impressed by Sony's 2nd Life rip off service. Sony may can give all the lip service they want but they are loosing their shirts on the PS3 which is evident by their gaming devisions year end report. The 360 is in the Black now and the Wii was in teh Black day one. With a very weak holiday line up, I don't know if Sony can stop the bleeding.
This artical also bothers me with the comment "in its first year, the PS3 nearly doubled the sales of the original PlayStation?" Fist of all the gaming community is several times the size that it was in when the Playstation was first released. Aside from that, it was up against the ICON of gaming itself in the SNES. Sony started off in 3rd behind Nintendo and the Blue Hedgehog whose customer base was already loyal and watching Mario cartoons while eating their mario cerial and what not. Every company needs time to grow and sony did this with teh PS2, but I fear that they will loose out this generation if all indications stay true.
psfan @ Nov 20th 2007 10:18AM
@9 and you miss playstation so much that you had come to ps3fanboy!!. dont worry we dont want you back. stay with the crap box.
on a lighter note. i knew that the ps3 only needed time to start being a contender again. HATERS have always wished death on the playstation brand. but after a while we all started seeing the black(or gray) system in more and more houses. what people dont realize is what your getting for the price. take psp for example. it can replace alot of your crappy gadgets.
devilock @ Nov 20th 2007 10:31AM
I don't have a ps3 or any new system for that matter. I got my Playstation in 99' and it still works for spyro. I got a Playstation 2 in 2001, about a year ago it gave me the DISC READ ERROR but It got fixed when I blew it with a keyboard cleaner. I got the PSP when it launched, fine piece of machine, love it so much I have just got a psp slim (black).
Compared to the ps1 and ps2 it seems to me that the PS3 is by far made the most progress in one year.
MadCowMartin @ Nov 20th 2007 11:15AM
You can't compare current day sales to those of 10 years ago, not only are there now 1 billion people more in the world, economics and purchase behaviour have also changed. And apart from that all, it might be selling more than the PS1, but way less than the PS2, and products like these are ought to have a continious rising line, not a big fall.
You can present statistics any way you like but you're being a bit too enthusiastic about a year thats surely below the expectations of Sony themself.
Noshino @ Nov 20th 2007 12:51PM
MadCowMartin,
Yes, but you can't compare it to the PS2, to begin with because the price is almost twice as much.
Also, take in mind that the PS3 has ran into much more bad press, I think this time around Microsoft is actually using their "tricks" and well, let's just say there has been many really bad press for the PS3.
Yes, they should have a continious rising line, but remember all the factors, that when summed up, make sense
- Bad Press
- "No games"
- High price
And just to show you that the "want" for the PlayStation product is there, here, check how many people signed up for one, and I bet more will once the article appears in other sites as well...
http://playstation.joystiq.com/2007/11/19/celebrate-ps3s-birthday-by-winning-an-80gb-system/
Adam @ Nov 20th 2007 1:21PM
I "want" a Corvette, that does not mean that I can afford one.
ScottH @ Nov 20th 2007 1:53PM
good article.
Henry @ Nov 20th 2007 2:21PM
The real reason it is so hard to compare the PS3 with the PS1 and PS2 is that, the PS2 is also a PS1, and is still a factor in the console market today.
The PS2 is still getting engineering updates, and people are still buying new ones! While the X-Box still gets use in many homes, it has been left as old hat. There are so many PS2's that there is still a market for new games too! The PS3 is the solution without a problem, and will either have to be updated to compete with the next console releases or be skipped entirely.
Bee @ Nov 20th 2007 4:45PM
You've missed the ultimate clincher for a 'veteran' gamer like myself. The PS3 belches out heat to keep my feet warm on cold winter nights of play.
Jon @ Nov 20th 2007 2:37PM
cool article, thanks ps3fan. I really enjoyed going back and looking at the launch titles for the psx and ps2. I would love a ps3, but find it a bit cost prophibitive still. I didn't get my ps2 till the first round of price cuts, and that's fine with me, more games to chose from when I finally have one.
My ps2 has given me problems over the years, but as someone else mentioned, nothing I couldn't fix with a screwdriver and a can of air. It took me 20 minutes the first time I fixed it - nothing like a RRoD taking 2 - 3 weeks (just sayin is all.)
I love my psx (original retail title for the Playstation from back when it was to be a Nintendo product) and my ps2. I'm growing rather fond of my 360, but we are by no means exclusive. I will get a ps3 in time, and it will be awesome.
Damien @ Nov 22nd 2007 2:48AM
According to this article, we should all go out and buy Sony shares, because the PS3 is gonna outsell the PS1 & PS2! hahahahahaha
Look at any data you want, it all points to the same thing. Sony screwed up this generation and PS3 is in last place BY FAR!!!
If you want to see how stupid this article is, go compare the sales of the Wii. If you go by the logic of the writer, the Wii is gonna sell 10 billion units (even though there's less than 6 billion people on the planet). Give me a break!!! PS3 ONLY did as well as it did for 2 reasons:
1. Blu-Ray players were $1000 when PS3 came out, so basically you got a Blu-Ray player for half price.
2. Playstation brand loyalty.
Now that high definition players have come down to $100 (Toshiba HD-DVD A2-HD), and every Sony fanboy has already got their PS3, there's no place to go but down!
You know what they say about sinking ships? Sony is the damn Titanic!!!
Percy @ Nov 20th 2007 2:58PM
@devilock:
Are you serious? Are you looking at the same stats as I am? As far as "success" goes, anyone who thinks the PS3 is more successful than the PS2 is smoking something I've never heard of. The 4 main categories from this article that a VP or CEO would really care about are the first 4: units shipped, launch, price cuts and software sales; with units shipped being the strongest indicator. Only 2/3 of what PS2 sold in the first year. How is this "better"? When the PS3 has several price cuts all in the first year, with slower sales when compared to either the PS2 which had more sales in the first year and no price cuts, and the Wii which has had no price cuts and unbelievable sales, how is the PS3 better? When the PS3 has less titles than the PS1 in its first year, and embarrassingly less than the PS2, how is this better? I'm not arguing the quality of the PS3 over other consoles, I'm talking about strictly the success, i.e. the sales. When people talk about the success of the Wii, they're not talking about how incredibly powerful and ground-breaking the technology in the console is, because nobody in their right mind would say that the Wii is more "powerful" than the PS3. And yet who in their right mind could even think about saying that the PS3 is more successful than the Wii (at this moment in time, anyway). Maybe the PS3 will one day overtake the Wii in sales. But there's no way you could twist any numbers to convince a right-minded person that the PS3 is more successful than the PS2. (Sorry for pulling the Wii into all of this, I was just using it to drive home my point).
Also, to touch on MadCowMartin and Noshino's discussion, you CAN compare units shipped compared to older products (with a grain of salt), especially if the newer product sells less. When a product sells significantly less than its predecessor, whatever its relative price, then sales-wise it has not succeeded. Since the only thing that could have happened since the PS2's release is that the targeted market would have grown, then losing sales is bad. If the world has gained say 5-10% in population since the PS2 (a reasonable estimate for 7 years of growth), then one might expect at least that much growth. When a new product sells significantly more than its predecessor, more than just a ~1% growth per year since its predecessor first went on sale, then it has most likely succeeded.
Louis @ Nov 20th 2007 2:58PM
Very good article. Nice to see the comparison when Sony themselves spin the truth so much.
The biggest disappointment and criticism is the games library. The number of titles are picking up with Ratchet and Clank and Uncharted, but it is still pretty slim.
The best thing about the PS3, the hardware itself. The thing is flawless and well built. The interface is elegant, and though I own both, it makes my 360 feel like a toy when you hear that orchestra warming up.
My PS2 is still kicking at Age 7, so I expect the PS3 to do the same.
djmajin @ Nov 20th 2007 3:01PM
@10.... how do you figure the 360 arcade is a crippled version of the xbox... last time i checked they didnt remove usb ports or backwards compatibility like the true crippled revision ::cough 40gb ps3 cough::
if you want to make it the same as any other xbox then just get the hard drive
i fail to see your logic on how its crippled
cs @ Nov 20th 2007 4:40PM
That's all well and good, but take a look at how Playstation 3's competition is doing in comparison to competitors for the past systems. Maybe look at what percentage of consoles sold last year were PS3 versus that of PS1. I bet the percentage is lower.
Astyfoo @ Nov 20th 2007 4:54PM
Wow, when a ps3 FANBOY site says "[e]ven PlayStation fanboys must admit that the PlayStation 3 had a rocky start" you know the console has been a complete flop. The 'liberal (anti-sony) media' charge is as hilarious here as when Fox News uses it. The PS3 has had 1 good game since launch (Resistance) and was $500+. What a surprise it was a flop!
Proud PS2 owner waiting for Sony to get their act together, perhaps 2008 will be the year.
gamerz @ Nov 20th 2007 5:04PM
For anyone with a rear-projection TV the PS3 is NOT a viable choice since it *downscales* nearly all games to only 480p. The 360 will *upscale* ALL games to 1080i so that's a much better system for anyone with a rear-projection TV.
karlo @ Nov 20th 2007 7:05PM
It seems to me the PS3 is still at launch. The PS3 has already been out for a year, but every single one of my friends and coworkers want it and are anticipating it. While I get to laugh at them, they just seem to always want it. 3 of 5 of my coworkers bought it as soon as the price cut, and a lot of my friends got the new 40GB. Whenever someone buys it, it floods my entire school. Everyone seems to want it even more. Its like a disease. The number of extreme gamers that keep track of hardware for there favorite console (fanboys), is very low. But the number of people that want the highest tech machine (the PS3) is indeed very high. Thats where the success of the PS3 comes in. The success of the PS3 also comes in the number of Playstation 2 owners and fanboys. Once these owners and fanboys of the PS2 decide to get next-gen, the numbers of the PS3 owners increase. Thats why the success of the PS2 was very important, so the PS3 can ride on its coat-tails. But you can't pull that off with the 360, with only 25 million owners of the original; and it not being the highest tech machine, we aren't looking at jaw dropping numbers for it.
In conclusion, I think that no doubt that the PS3 will prevail as the PS2/1 did so.
jamal @ Nov 20th 2007 7:24PM
@27... You must be kidding right? Upscaling doesn't happen with any TV that can't support the wanted upscaling format. I own both the 360 and PS3, and none can upscale to 1080i/p my rear projection TV. And by the way, your precious Halo can only do 567p.
Kaemon @ Nov 21st 2007 12:58PM
I find it odd that there is so much Optimism about the PS3. Reminds me of my blind optimism that I had with the GCN for a while. While sure the GCN didn't fail, it wasn't what anyone would call a Success. Ya know? And the whole PS3 thing seems alot like it...
bloodCapsilKiller7 @ Nov 25th 2007 2:28PM
PLAYSTATION AND SONY FOR MY LIFE.....PLAYSTATION RULES OVER ANYTHING ELSE
Dennis @ Nov 25th 2007 8:11PM
Some text in your article under the "Launch" heading doesn't sound right to me:
Sony reported the PS3 was the fastest PlayStation console to reach 1 million sales, only taking the new machine six weeks to hit the landmark. Although reliable sales figures for the PS2 and PS1 are hard to come by today, the PlayStation 2 was breaking records in its own right when it launched. In the first 24 hours, the PlayStation 2 sold 500,000 units ...
So if Sony broke a PS record by reaching 1 million sales of PS3 in six weeks, and PS2 sold 500,000 units in the first 24 hours, then are you trying to tell me that the PS2 could not sell the second 500,000 units in five weeks and six days following the launch? That sounds fishy.
Why would there be such an overwhelming demand of 500,000 units for the PS2 on opening day, but then a sharp decline so that the same number couldn't be sold in the following 5 weeks, 6 days? Please explain, or is that the part about the reliable sales figures not being available for PS2? And if those figures are that unreliable as to not even make common sense, why are they included here?
Chris @ Nov 25th 2007 9:39PM
Dennis, those numbers and figures are official directly from Sony.
While it may seem a bit unbelievable that Sony couldn't sell an additional 500,000 PS2 units in six weeks, you have to remember Sony was having a lot of trouble keeping up with demand for the PS2s after the initial launch systems were sold.
Just check out this article for proof: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A03E4DA1F3AF93AA1575AC0A9669C8B63