Monster Madness for PS3 titled and detailed
by Jem Alexander 
{ Feb 5th 2008 at 10:45PM }
Is this the first time you've heard of the game? You'd be forgiven if that's the case, considering the 360 version has only an average of 55 on metacritic. We don't expect the above improvements to drag the game out of mediocrity (and, as far as we're concerned, obscurity), but you can't forgive the developers for trying!
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
The Sound @ Feb 5th 2008 11:12PM
*sigh*
Still getting shitty 360 ports even after a year?
RPGJock @ Feb 5th 2008 11:41PM
To be honest this would have happen if the PS3 came out first anyway. Developers try desperately to recoup any money they can when a game doesn't sell very well. Hell developers try to recoup money when a game sell incredible well. Like everybody else out there, everyday someone hustling....
I am just saying...
Consolcwby @ Feb 6th 2008 1:47AM
@Jem: Uhm, I'm not trying to be a jerk or anything, but I believe the expression should read: 'but you can't blame the developers for trying!' instead of: 'but you can't forgive the developers for trying!'... the way you have it sounds a bit... unmerciful. =D
Deafraiders @ Feb 6th 2008 5:33AM
No wonder why the 360s are always recieving 'Ring of Fire', with the worthless games they are getting.
jtedesco33 @ Feb 6th 2008 8:46AM
How does it feel to get sloppy seconds all the time?